Stuck on an issue?
Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Better name for executeSlashCommand
See original GitHub issueImo executeSlashCommand is a bad name and other functions are named eg. deleteSlashResponse. So imo we should find a better name for that.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:7 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Creating slash commands - discord.js Guide
At a minimum, the definition of a slash command must have a name and a description. Slash command names must be between 1-32...
Read more >Enabling interactivity with Slash Commands - Slack API
By enabling Slash Commands, your app can be summoned by users from any ... Command - the name of command, the actual string...
Read more >Introduction to slash commands | Discord.Net Documentation
Slash commands are made up of a name, description, and a block of options, which you can think of like arguments to a...
Read more >Discord slash commands using python - Stack Overflow
respond("You executed the slash command!") I tried replacing "bot = discord.Bot" with "bot = commands.Bot" but that didn't work either. The ...
Read more >Discord.JS v13 - Slash Commands [Ep. 4] - YouTube
Slash Commands are a new feature Discord recently added to make commands more organized and user friendly. In this tutorial I'll show you ......
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
I would prefer something like
sendXXXXsince we havesendMessage,sendDirectMessageand so on even in boilerplate we havesendEmbed,sendResponseetc…As we discussed,
sendInteractionResponseis API-compliant and unambiguous.