Updating definition of "following" in twarc2 docs?
See original GitHub issueCurrently the definition of following in twarc2 docs is:
following Get the users who are following a given user.
But presuming this corresponds to GET friends/list
in Twitter API perhaps it might be clearer if this read:
following Get the users who are followed by a given user.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:8 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
twarc2 (en) - twarc
twarc2 is a command line tool and Python library for archiving Twitter JSON data. Each tweet is represented as a JSON object that...
Read more >How to include a "$" symbol in a twarc2 search query
I'm trying to find the counts for the term “$BTC” for a granularity of per day. I've tried the following queries, with their...
Read more >twarc2. twarc has been redesigned from the… | by Ed Summers
On the surface the v2 API update seems pretty insignificant since the shape of a tweet, its parts, properties and affordances, aren't changing ......
Read more >Getting Data from Twitter: A twarc tutorial - GitHub
Navigate to your twarc-tutorial folder by typing the following into the command prompt: cd documents/twarc-tutorial-master and hitting enter.
Read more >Search Tweets - How to build a query | Docs - Twitter Developer
For example, the following query will work because it uses the #hashtag operator, ... meaning that Tweets will match only if both conditions...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Future twarc users thank you @jwyg!
I’m not sure why, but this fits my brain better:
Maybe because it ties the name of the subcommand to the description?