Group options
See original GitHub issueIs it possible to add a feature for dynamically grouping options, like:
Naval Fate.
Usage:
naval_fate.py ship new <name>...
naval_fate.py ship <name> move <x> <y> [ship_options]
naval_fate.py ship shoot <x> <y>
naval_fate.py mine (set|remove) <x> <y> [mine_options]
naval_fate.py [options]
Options:
-h --help Show this screen.
--version Show version.
Mine Options:
--moored Moored (anchored) mine.
--drifting Drifting mine.
Ship Options:
--speed=<kn> Speed in knots [default: 10].
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 8 years ago
- Reactions:4
- Comments:9 (1 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Options Group > Options Group Home
See why Options Group is the premier global recruiting firm for financial services with executive search talent planning, acquisition and retention.
Read more ><optgroup>: The Option Group element - MDN Web Docs
The <optgroup> HTML element creates a grouping of options within a <select> element. Try it. HTML Demo: <optgroup>. Reset. HTML CSS
Read more >HTML optgroup tag - W3Schools
The <optgroup> tag is used to group related options in a <select> element (drop-down list). If you have a long list of options,...
Read more >Create a group & choose group settings - Google Groups Help
Create a group & choose group settings · Find people with similar hobbies or interests and take part in online conversations. · Email...
Read more >Group Options
Group Options contains a number of additional options available for groups and blocks. When importing rooming lists, select the Rooming List button to...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@frnhr @keleshev
I don’t understand why we need an additional syntax for it. It works for
options
:Just let it work for
more_options
the same way:?
@conqp probably quicker if you close it yourself…