Naming convention of types

I am unsure whether or not I have missed a configuration step, but my generated types for arrays is looking like this after upgrading to 0.14.1:

export namespace GetMachinesForFleetInventory {
  export type Variables = {};

  export type Query = {
    __typename?: "Query";

    machines: Machines[] | null;
  };

  export type Machines = {
    __typename?: "Machine";

    id: number;

    model: string | null;

    category: string | null;

    brand: string | null;

    productionDate: Date | null;
  };
}

I would really want Machines[] to be Machine[] (the __typename), as working with them in singular form.

Is there a configuration for this? 😃

[janhartmann]

I can see why the codegen does this, and maybe I just need to adjust my mind to this naming.

I guess I am just used to have a Machine and when its an array its Machine[]. So the __typename is the one defining the type 😃

[codepunkt]

@dotansimha Thanks for your work! 😃

New version, new problems. See #1535