Support signing assemblies in .tar.gz files
See original GitHub issueRelated to #941.
We currently don’t support signing the managed assemblies in a .tar.gz
file. This scenario is used by .NET for Apache Spark (see conversation here).
Because of this, dotnet/spark currently needs to sign first, and then package the “Worker” application into .zip
and .tar.gz
files after signing. If arcade supported signing the assemblies inside of .tar.gz
files, then we could simplify dotnet/spark’s build even further and create the “Worker” packages at the same time we create the NuGet packages. And then signing would come later on the NuGet packages, .zip files and .tar.gz files.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:15 (15 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Install tar.gz file in maven repository
I have a compressed tar.gz file and I want use it as dependency for other projects. I am unable upload it in maven...
Read more >TarFile Class (System.Formats.Tar)
Creates a tar file that contains all the filesystem entries from the specified directory. CreateFromDirectoryAsync(String, Stream, Boolean, CancellationToken).
Read more >How to: Sign an assembly with a strong name | ...
Select the Sign the assembly checkbox, which expands the options. Select the Browse button to choose a Strong name key file path.
Read more >How do you run tar.gz packages in Raspian?
to un-archive the file, you run this on the command line. Code: Select all tar -xvzf tarfile.tar.gz. Which will then extract the contents...
Read more >Install a package from a local tarball file
Navigate to the folder where you saved your tarball. Note: The Package Manager only recognizes tarballs with the .tgz extension. Double-click the tarball...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
They should be good, except that the assemblies in them are probably already signed. So you may want to sign with a different certificate to ensure it is acting appropriately (if you are fully testing end-to-end).
It doesn’t seem like a lot of work Mark. I’ll schedule some time to do a better investigation (prototype?) on this and update this issue back. I expected to come back with news before Tue.