Perf problem on existence checks caused by SqlClient's connection resiliency feature
See original GitHub issueWhen using the same DbContext class (e.g. DbContext itself) with different connection strings, the Connection Resiliency Feature of .Net 4.5 causes DB-creation and deletion (EnsureCreated/EnsureDeleted) to take a long time (due to the DB-Existency checks).
I made a small repro sample where you can see the different effects. Basically when using 2 default connection strings (without modified connection resiliency settings) with the same DbContext class, the DB-Creation takes >10s (as this seems to be the default ConnectRetryInterval, even when the MSDN docs suggest something else).
Repro sample
static void Main (string[] args)
{
// Default resiliency settings (since .NET 4.5)
var defaultConnectionString = "Data Source=localhost;Initial Catalog=EFIdleResiliencyBug1;Integrated Security=SSPI";
// Retry Interval = 3s (instead of 10 which seems to be the default)
var connectionStringThreeSeconds = "Data Source=localhost;Initial Catalog=EFIdleResiliencyBug2;Integrated Security=SSPI;ConnectRetryInterval=3";
// Retry Count = 0 (instead of 1) => means Resiliency Feature is disabled.
var connectionStringZeroRetry = "Data Source=localhost;Initial Catalog=EFIdleResiliencyBug3;Integrated Security=SSPI;ConnectRetryCount=0;";
// Here we also create a default connection string but with a different db
var defaultConnectionString2 = "Data Source=localhost;Initial Catalog=EFIdleResiliencyBug4;Integrated Security=SSPI";
Drop(defaultConnectionString); // takes > 10s
Drop(connectionStringZeroRetry); // Takes no time (connection resiliency disabled)
Drop(connectionStringThreeSeconds); // takes > 3s
Drop(defaultConnectionString2); // takes > 10s
//All connection strings (same DbContext class) try to connect to the DB.
Create(defaultConnectionString); // BUG: Takes 10s
Create(connectionStringThreeSeconds); // BUG: Takes 3s
Create(connectionStringZeroRetry); // Takes no time (connection resiliency disabled)
Create(defaultConnectionString2); // BUG: Takes 10s (seems to be the default RetryInterval for some reason).
// Note: When using a different derived class from DBContext for each connection string the bug does not exist.
// Expected Behavior: Ignore connection resiliency for checking if the db exists. (It should not take 3s or even 10s).
// This is especially a problem when executing integration / unit tests that drop the db at the beginning.
}
private static void Create(string connectionString)
{
Console.WriteLine($"Creating {connectionString}");
var sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
using (var dbContext = new TestDbContext(connectionString))
{
dbContext.Database.EnsureCreated();
Console.WriteLine("Creating DB took: " + sw.Elapsed);
}
}
private static void Drop(string connectionString)
{
Console.WriteLine($"Droping {connectionString}");
var sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
using (var dbContext = new TestDbContext(connectionString))
{
sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
dbContext.Database.EnsureDeleted();
Console.WriteLine("Deleting DB took: " + sw.Elapsed);
}
}
public class TestDbContext : DbContext
{
private readonly string _connectionString;
public TestDbContext(string connectionString)
{
_connectionString=connectionString;
}
protected override void OnConfiguring(DbContextOptionsBuilder options)
{
options.UseSqlServer(_connectionString);
}
}
I hope this helps you fix the API or adapt the docs.
But in my opinion the current API (EF Core) suggests that you can use the same class (DBContext) for multiple connection strings (ctor for this). However with .Net 4.5 that causes serious performance problems. This is especially noticable in our unit / integration tests where we drop multiple DBs with the same DBContext class and recreate them later.
Note: This issue was ported from EF 6 (http://entityframework.codeplex.com/workitem/2899) and re-tested with the EF.Core 1.1.0 (nuget package)
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Reactions:7
- Comments:12 (11 by maintainers)
I did some more investigation and here is what I learned:
I confirmed the behavior in .NET Framework and .NET Core is the same regarding removing the password from connection string once the connection is opened (although I am sure the implementation is different because in .NET Core SqlClient does not seem to rely on
SecureString
). Note that the password commonly needs to be specified in the connection string in platforms where integrated security is not supported (i.e. anywhere but in Windows).In .NET Framework
SqlConnection
implementsICloneable.Clone()
explicitly, so the probability of having a uniform way to clone the connection without losing credentials in the short term is small.There doesn’t seem to be a public way to mutate
ConnectRetryCount
onSqlConnection
other than mutatingConnectionString
. Also, mutatingConnectionString
actually resets any password stored internally in theSqlConnection
object, i.e. the following code will fail at the last line with the messageLogin failed for user 'diego'.
:Given all of this I re-discussed the issue with @ajcvickers who had done some investigation around it before and we both came to the conclusion that there isn’t anything reasonable we can do on EF Core to address this problem in all cases. There is something we could do that would work in some cases though:
Store aside the connection string passed to us in
UseSqlServer()
so that we can modify it withConnectRetryCount=0
(or at leastConnectRetryInterval=1
) to create a separate connection object with the purpose of checking for database existence.Note that this will fail if a
SqlConnection
object on which the password has already been removed fromConnectionString
property (i.e. that was already opened) is passed toUseSqlServer()
.We are now debating whether implementing this workaround in EF Core would actually be much better than making customers aware of the fact that SqlClient assumes
ConnectRetryCount=1; ConnectRetryInterval=10
by default, i.e. by having our database creation methods issue a warning recommending to override these values so that EF Core can much better take care of connection retries with its own logic (e.g. see how the implementation of existence checks in our SQL Server provider, which leverages knowledge of whether the database has just been created to implement connection retries more efficiently https://github.com/aspnet/EntityFramework/blob/dev/src/Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer/Storage/Internal/SqlServerDatabaseCreator.cs#L118).In the end we suspect this whole issue could much better addressed if SqlClient exposed a way to temporarily override their connection resiliency feature.
We now have the new SqlClient dependency, so this can now be implemented. https://github.com/dotnet/efcore/pull/20805