Add Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.AzureEventHub
See original GitHub issueIs your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
This is simply an additional logger provider for a popular choice of logging sink.
Describe the solution you’d like
I would like to be able to pump events raised through ILogger<T>
to an additional logger provider, that sends the events to an Azure Event Hubs instance.
Describe alternatives you’ve considered
There are no alternatives within the M.E.L. ecosystem.
Additional context
The format of these events should be customisable, but a default formatter shall be provided.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:15 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Runpath.Extensions.Logging.AzureEventHubs 1.2.0
Azure Event Hubs logger provider implementation for Microsoft.Extensions.Logging. Getting started. Grab the package from NuGet, which will ...
Read more >LaCorridor.Logging.AzureEventHubs 0.1.5
EventHubs implements logger providers for .NET Core 2.0 applications. It intends to provide a simple way to write .NET Core application logs ......
Read more >UKHO/EventHub-Logging-Provider
Logging to log to Azure EventHub - GitHub - UKHO/EventHub-Logging-Provider: Log provider for Microsoft.Extensions.Logging to log to Azure EventHub.
Read more >How to log events to Azure Event Hubs in Azure API ...
Browse to your API Management instance. · Select APIs, and then select the API to which you want to add the policy. ·...
Read more >Logging providers - .NET
Microsoft Extensions include the following logging providers as part of the runtime libraries: ... The following logging providers are shipped by ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
We don’t have plans for significant features in 3.1 as it is planned to be a small release focused on bugfixes. I’ll put this issue in the backlog to consider as we get more feedback.
We’re generally happy to help review code, even for these third-party components, so feel free to tag me in PRs to wherever this lands (and I can bring in other folks from the team). While we aren’t able to commit to the full first-party support level, we really want to help the community build up around these providers and code reviewing is one concrete way we can do that.