New CodeAnalysis attribute breaking nanoFramework builds
See original GitHub issueHi,
Recently this line was added: https://github.com/AArnott/Nerdbank.GitVersioning/blob/35b087bc50864c8da8b9abfd2124f59ee31a74dd/src/Nerdbank.GitVersioning.Tasks/AssemblyVersionInfo.cs#L545
Bring the System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.ExcludeFromCodeCoverage
attribute.
Because we don’t have that attribute in nanoFramework this is breaking our builds.
If you recall we had a previous contact in #346 because of a similar problem.
Any chance that can be wrapped with compiler defs?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:6
Top Results From Across the Web
New template of Version.new breaking nanoFramework build
Hi, We at nanoFramework are using Nerdbank.GitVersioning in our class libs. It uses it's project system and mscorlib.
Read more >Show dotnet: Build your own unit test platform? The true ...
I'd like to show dotnet how we built a test framework for .NET nanoFramework. .NET nanoFramework is an implementation of .
Read more >Building .NET nanoFramework in Visual Studio
Install Visual Studio 2019 Community and workloads. You should now have the pieces in place to build, deploy and debug the nanoFramework interpreter,...
Read more >How to fail .NET 4.5 build with Microsoft.CodeAnalysis. ...
right-click on the project and go to Properties ,; go to Code Analysis tab,; in active rules there is by default Microsoft Managed ......
Read more >QP-nano: Revision History
The QP-nano framework is being phased out and is not recommended for new product development. Version 6.8.2, 2020-06-30. Updated 3rd_party/CMSIS to version 5.7....
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Well we rarely change this area, so I guess we can see how far we get without in-repo validation again. Thanks for your flexibility.
On a simplified approach you could just leave it as it is. Meaning that there won’t be any test for nF builds. Anything breaking the build will be picked up sooner or latter…