Do not put version information in debian package name
See original GitHub issueWhen installing on Ubuntu, we are currently being told to run:
sudo apt-get install dotnet-dev-1.0.0-preview2-003121
The package ecosystem supports the notion of versions internally without them having to be part of the published package name. It would be nice if there was just a meta package available to install the latest dotnet
and all dependencies. This would also ensure that auto-updaters will pick up on new releases and automatically install them.
What I’d like to see is the install step above to change to this:
sudo apt-get install dotnet-dev
or perhaps
sudo apt-get install dotnet-dev
If a specific version is needed, there are other mechanisms to provide and interpret that metadata within the apt package ecosystem.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:29 (11 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Inserting a version number in debian package name
I am currently working on a project with a central library (librapidstorm), multiple plugins (one of them named rapidstorm-fitter) and a binary ...
Read more >What do the different version elements specify in debian ...
The format of Debian version numbers is defined in the Debian policy (but it doesn't answer all your questions). 1: is an epoch....
Read more >Chapter 7. Basics of the Debian package management ...
The Package field gives the package name. This is the name by which the package can be manipulated by the package tools, and...
Read more >5. Control files and their fields
The field itself may be omitted from a binary package control file when the source package has the same name and version as...
Read more >8. Shared libraries — Debian Policy Manual v4.6.2.0
If your package contains files whose names do not change with each change in the library shared object version, you must not put...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@atrauzzi RTFM-ing is perfectly fine. 😃 Will read through it. I was looking for a decent way to improve the experience.
I think this can be closed by the recent update to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/build/distribution-packaging.