question-mark
Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

Tag v5.0.101-servicing.20601.7 does not build: unable to load source 'darc-pub-dotnet-runtime-b02e13ab'

See original GitHub issue

From v5.0.101-servicing.20601.7 (which I assume is what produced 5.0.101 since it’s the only tag with 5.0.101 in it):

./build.sh --restore --build --pack
...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/work/artifacts/toolset/restore.proj : error : Unable to load the service index for source https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/darc-pub-dotnet-runtime-b02e13ab/nuget/v3/index.json.
/work/artifacts/toolset/restore.proj : error : Unable to load the service index for source https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/darc-pub-dotnet-runtime-b02e13ab/nuget/v3/index.json.
Build failed (exit code '1').

https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/blob/d5eb2b9c5a4e51be4b26781958785d8817e25b04/NuGet.config#L9-L11

When I go to https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging?_a=feed&feed=darc-pub-dotnet-runtime-b02e13ab to check up on the feed, I see this:

image


@dotnet/dnceng are you able to restore the feed? Or is the tag supposed to be buildable a different way?

Issue Analytics

  • State:closed
  • Created 3 years ago
  • Comments:11 (11 by maintainers)

github_iconTop GitHub Comments

1reaction
riarenascommented, Dec 31, 2020

The disabled package sources only disables the feeds that would be inaccessible for external users. It doesn’t disabled -pub because that would make the shas unbuildable (without modifications) on devs machines during the release cycle.

That’s the part I was missing about disabled sources. Thanks, that makes sense.

0reactions
dagoodcommented, Dec 31, 2020

The disabled package sources only disables the feeds that would be inaccessible for external users.

If we were deleting them intentionally, this would apply (or rather, we’d want some better infra that works at any point in time rather than only for a certain group of users vs. another).

But since it isn’t intentional to delete these, yeah, no need. Closing as resolved. Thanks to both of you for looking into this.

Read more comments on GitHub >

github_iconTop Results From Across the Web

No results found

github_iconTop Related Medium Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related StackOverflow Question

No results found

github_iconTroubleshoot Live Code

Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free

github_iconTop Related Reddit Thread

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hackernoon Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Tweet

No results found

github_iconTop Related Dev.to Post

No results found

github_iconTop Related Hashnode Post

No results found