Unify names of argument --source-feed vs -s,--source

Steps to reproduce

Try:

dotnet nuget push -h

Usage: dotnet nuget push [arguments] [options]

Arguments:
  [root]  Specify the path to the package and your API key to push the package to the server.

Options:
  ...
  -s|--source <source>           Specifies the server URL
  ...

then:

dotnet tool install -h

Usage: dotnet tool install [options] <PACKAGE_ID>

Arguments:
  <PACKAGE_ID>   NuGet Package Id of the tool to install.

Options:
  ...
  --source-feed <SOURCE_FEED>   Adds an additional NuGet package source to use during installation.
  ...

Expected behavior

dotnet tool install should have -s, --source switch instead of --source-feed without (unreserved) -s alias

Actual behavior

dotnet nuget push has -s, --source, and dotnet tool install has --source-feed.

Environment data

dotnet --info output:

.NET Core SDK (reflecting any global.json):
 Version:   2.1.300-preview3-008443
 Commit:    1e2e8138b9

[tmds]

It would be nice if dotnet tool install provided a --source parameter that is consistent with the other commands: i.e. not additive.

I like this consistency since we are not going to remove --source parameter from the other commands and we are used to how it behaves.

I see this when changing some scripts. I want to pass the same feeds to dotnet tool install as I am passing to dotnet restore and suddenly I need to deal with different semantics 😕

Whether it makes sense to have an additive source parameter is a different question. A --source-feed (I personally like --add-source) can be added to dotnet tool install and other commands if it useful.

[livarcocc]

Sounds good to me.