Cannot auto-install Rustup from preference page
See original GitHub issueI’m setting up a new machine where I don’t have rust
installed. I’m following the steps recommended by Corrosion. After installing cargo
manually (as asked by the Cargo wizard), I could create a cargo project.
When opening editor, I see the popup asking me to go though Preferences to configure extra things (like rustup), on the preference page, I click “Install” and then get an error:
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:8 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
How to Install and Configure the Rust Programming Language
The preferred method of installation is via Rustup. Rustup is a tool that provides a consistent installation method across all platforms. Linux.
Read more >Install Rust - Rust Programming Language
To download Rustup and install Rust, run the following in your terminal, then follow the on-screen instructions. See "Other Installation Methods" if you...
Read more >Rustup is not recognised but rustic —version works
Rustup is just a toolchain manager, used to install different versions of Rust. So my guess is that you have installed Rust but...
Read more >Use rustup or distro's package manager? : r/rust - Reddit
I installed rust in my Arch Linux system using Arch's package ... the Arch repos but there isn't a problem installing from the...
Read more >I can't install rust on my mac - Super User
curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://sh.rustup.rs | sh. I did installed brew install curl-openssl but still I cant install rust.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 2:52 PM Max Bureck notifications@github.com wrote:
Sounds like it. Pointing to non-existing file should be logged. Maybe we can just check whether the config is empty string and not log in this case?
Then we should either
Because if someone configures a config file and this is non-existent, I would expect a message in the log.