Missing support for `jsx` option

Recently esbuild v0.12.1 introduced the jsx=preserve option: https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#0121.

Would be great if rollup-plugin-esbuild would add support for passing the option through.

[egoist]

Will add it soon 👌🏻

On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 6:43 AM Max Milton @.***> wrote:

Yes, pretty much.

In projects which use the https://github.com/solidjs/solid framework, they require a babel preset https://github.com/solidjs/solid/tree/main/packages/babel-preset-solid to convert JSX into solid specific runtime calls. Solid leverages the JSX ecosystem rather than implementing their own component DSL.

For TypeScript support in these projects it’s currently required to use @babel/preset-typescript along with tsconfig.json like:

{ “compilerOptions”: { “jsx”: “preserve”, “jsxImportSource”: “solid-js” } }

With the jsx=preserve option in rollup-plugin-esbuild, I was hoping I could rip out @babel/preset-typescript and instead transpile TS via rollup-plugin-esbuild first for faster build times. That way I could run babel only on files which might be solid components (*.tsx).

— You are receiving this because you commented.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/egoist/rollup-plugin-esbuild/issues/261#issuecomment-850708091, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACDAWSFQQZM62LFEAARFXKDTQAMCPANCNFSM45PCQR4Q .

[github-actions[bot]]

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 4.3.0 🎉

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀