Add field for process owner to `Process` schema
See original GitHub issueRunning processes on a system have an owner - whether that be a uid
like 0 in Linux for root or SYSTEM
on Windows. I don’t currently see a way to represent process ownership in ECS. I’m proposing that the following fields or something similar be added to ECS:
process.uid
and/or process.owner_name
Thoughts?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:10 (10 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Process Fields | Elastic Common Schema (ECS) Reference [8.5]
Field Description Level
process.interactive extended
process.pid Process id. type: long. example: 4242 core
process.same_as_process extended
Read more >Add or modify a work tracking field - Azure DevOps & TFS
To add a custom field, add field rules, or change the label of a field on a work item form, you modify the...
Read more >Create Multiple Business Processes - Salesforce Help
From Setup, enter Processes in the Quick Find box, then select the appropriate link. Click New. Choose an existing process to copy its...
Read more >View Configuration: Enable Existing Fields and Define New ...
Business process owners create and promote fields in these tables: ... you might need a field that exists in the Archibus schema but...
Read more >Define Data - Oracle Help Center
Business objects let you group related types of data together to define the data structure required for your process applications. Create business objects ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Ah interesting. Thanks! That makes sense. I think this issue has been resolved then.
Thanks @kgeller and @ebeahan for your help!!
Yes,
extended
is correct. Here the documentation is a bit better at explaining it than we have in the ecs repo.