3.1.5 installation fails on Linux
See original GitHub issueI have Ubuntu 17.10, I can run 3.1.5 properly with ./electron-cash But when I try to install it with “sudo python3 setup.py install”, I get the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "setup.py", line 12, in <module>
with open('contrib/requirements/requirements.txt') as f:
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'contrib/requirements/requirements.txt'
Thanks!
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:11
Top Results From Across the Web
core/3.1.5-install-instructions.md at main · dotnet/core - GitHub
Note: Some distros require an additional step to enable access to the SSL certificate. If you experience SSL errors when running dotnet restore...
Read more >problem installing caret package R 3.1.5 ubuntu 18
These error messages only tell us that the car could not be installed. The most likely reason is some missing system dependency. Basically...
Read more >cannot install the best update candidate for package
using Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.4 (Ootpa) ran into these 5 problems while updating sudo yum update Updating Subscription Management ...
Read more >Problems upgrading from 3.0.9 to 3.1.5 - Google Groups
I found the .build_number and other .files in the download zip file, so I just copied them into the gallery installation and the...
Read more >3 Installation and Upgrade Issues - Oracle Help Center
Section 3.1.5, "Do Not Use Turkish Locale During Installation" ... Oracle Metadata Repository Creation Assistant on Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS/ES 4.0.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@einsteinsfool you’re right, we should repackage and sign a new package. I originally thought it would require some code changes (and therefore not be deterministic) - but that turned out not to be the case.
However, the GitHub tarball that I linked should be trusted. It is generated and provided by GitHub, so if you trust them (which this project does), the tarball can be trusted as well. It’s pretty much equivalent to cloning the repository and rolling back to a specific tag.
Also would be great to have link to signature near download link for package itself. Rather than forcing every user to search for signature file in repository on github.