Packaging Electron v5+ with sandbox (AppImage)
See original GitHub issue- Version: 21.2.0
- Target: AppImage
See: https://github.com/electron-userland/electron-builder/issues/3872
This issue was closed, but the solution only fixes the problem for .deb
builds. AppImages are still broken by default, and there’s currently no solution (other than asking people to manually patch their AppImage). Is there any recommended course of action for broken AppImage releases?
Thanks!
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions:6
- Comments:6 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Packaging Electron v5 with sandbox (linux) #3872 - GitHub
Try running the AppImage without sh/bash preloader but with --no-sandbox argument, means don't hack the AppImage package in any way. I think ...
Read more >I have issues with Electron-based AppImages and their ...
AppImages based on Electron require the kernel to be configured in a certain way to allow for its sandboxing to work as intended ......
Read more >electron-builder | Yarn - Package Manager
A complete solution to package and build a ready for distribution Electron app for MacOS, Windows and Linux with “auto update” support out...
Read more >AppImage - electron-builder
description String | “undefined” - As description from application package.json, but allows you to specify different for Linux. category String | “undefined” - ......
Read more >Recent issues with Electron-based & AppImage apps on Pop ...
After the upgrade, certain apps (seems to be Electron-based and/or AppImages) ... which is the run from the CLI with --no-sandbox appended, ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Still an issue…
Still an issue…