Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

Don't edit packaging

See original GitHub issue

This is bad practice, it’s creating non reproducible builds, and general badness.

This error shouldn’t be possible: dpkg-source: error: source package has two conflicting values - maya-calendar and io.elementary.calendar

Houston stuck the string io.elementary.calendar in there somewhere at some point.

<bountysource-plugin>

Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource. </bountysource-plugin>

Issue Analytics

State:
Created 5 years ago
Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)

Top GitHub Comments

1reaction

codygarvercommented, Oct 5, 2018

@btkostner Source: is a unique line in debian/control and it’s ALWAYS the 1st line, it should be easy and reliable to read.

The reason not to rename all the packages affected by this right now is because it’s not part of the beta period fixes and I don’t want to create new problems because CI is telling me it’s a good time. I plan on gradually transitioning the package names and it’s gonna take a little time and testing to make sure it goes well. I’m still traumatized by renaming all the binaries before the beta started…

0reactions

danirabbitcommented, Mar 30, 2021

This doesn’t seem relevant anymore since we’re moving to flatpak