offset anchors towards facing direction
See original GitHub issueIs your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When a straight
arrow is anchored to a circular/round element, neither middle
nor auto
is a preferable choice.
Describe the solution you’d like
It would be nice if there were a variant of middle
where you could provide a radius
offset where the arrow would point towards the middle of the target element, but is radius
-amount shorter.
Of course, this type of anchor would only really be useful on straight arrows.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:7 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
offset-anchor - CSS: Cascading Style Sheets - MDN Web Docs
The offset-anchor CSS property specifies the point inside the box of an element traveling along an offset-path that is actually moving along ...
Read more >Offset anchor bolt and method of orientation
The anchor bolt is formed with an offset so that a substantial portion of the embedded portion of the anchor bolt is at...
Read more >GROUND ANCHORS AND ANCHORED SYSTEMS
Horizontal wales may be used to connect the ground anchors to the driven soldier beams. Horizontal wales can be installed on the face...
Read more >Offsetting or extruding faces
Select the Pull · Select the face or surface you want to offset or extrude. · (Optional) Add edges to your selection. ·...
Read more >Move a layer's anchor point in Motion - Apple Support
If you rotate a layer, it spins around this central anchor point. If you offset the anchor point, however, the layer no longer...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
understood, you are right and this is planned for the next release. will leave this issue open as a feature request until the next release that solves this.
For anyone interested, this is how I ended up sidestepping this issue (please excuse the messy code) note that this code is not very performant: