Add "origin" information to generated pipeline PY/DSL
See original GitHub issue- Create a basic pipeline (any pipeline will do)
- Run the pipeline
- Open the pipeline in Kubeflow Pipelines Note that version source and description are currently empty.
For the sake of traceability Elyra should (if possible) provide this information to enable Kubeflow Pipelines users to identify the pipeline origin. e.g Elyra <pipeline name>
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:9 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Downstream pipelines - GitLab Docs
A downstream pipeline is any GitLab CI/CD pipeline triggered by another pipeline. Downstream pipelines run independently and concurrently to the upstream ...
Read more >Tag your Git repo using Gitlab's CI/CD pipeline - Neron Joseph
Here, we are looking at methods of tagging using Gitlab's CI/CD pipeline code ... Then, we are removing the existing origin and add...
Read more >awesome-python-1/README.md at master - GitHub
Aims to cover everything from data mining to deep learning. spotify/luigi - Luigi is a Python module that helps you build complex pipelines...
Read more >Salt Documentation - manpages.ubuntu!
The topology is a simple server/client model with the needed functionality built into a single set of daemons. While the default configuration will...
Read more >Salt Documentation
If confirmed working correctly, please report and add a note on this page with the ... Generate Keys and host record and start...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Motivation: in a managed production environment many pipelines might be running over time. If there’s a need for an ops person to reach out to the owner of a workflow (e.g. because it was/is be utilizing a large amount of resources in a cluster) it should be possible to access identifying pipeline information that associates a pipeline with the entity that submitted it.
I haven’t been able to find any information about the version source. I did reach out to a few folks in Slack who might be able to point us in the right direction and am waiting for them to respond. I believe your proposal is good:
I do believe having identifying information embedded is important for production-ish use cases and would therefore advocate for a staged approach: