Rule request: no-arguments-for-named-blocks
See original GitHub issueSince named blocks (slots) will be landed soon in ember. We need to prepare handy rules to avoid some mistakes, like
disallow:
<MyComponent>
<:header />
</MyComponent>
<MyComponent>
<:header @fooBar="baz" >
</:header>
</MyComponent>
cc: @locks
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:10 (6 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Rule 34. Producing Documents, Electronically Stored ...
(D) Responding to a Request for Production of Electronically Stored Information. The response may state an objection to a requested form for producing ......
Read more >View Document - Arizona Court Rules
A party objecting to part of a request must specify the objectionable part and permit inspection of the other requested materials. (D) Responding...
Read more >Withholding Documents on the Basis of an Objection
The amendment to the rule created a mechanism for the requesting party to receive notice of “the fact that documents have been withheld...
Read more >The Sedona Conference Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34(b ...
Responding parties must respond to Rule 34 Requests for Production (“RFPs”) within 30 days of service or, if the request was delivered prior...
Read more >Rule 34 Amendment.FINAL.pdf - judicial.alabama.gov
amending, among other rules, Rule 34, Alabama Rules of Civil ... request (1) to produce and permit the party making the.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Another big one would be using the implicit default block:
@rwjblue there is really a lot of possible legshoot cases, could we aggregate it into single rule, instead of having
no-named-blocks-*
sets? Is it make sence?