httptools.parser.errors.HttpParserInvalidURLError on fragmented first line of the HTTP request.

Checklist

• The bug is reproducible against the latest release and/or master.
• There are no similar issues or pull requests to fix it yet.

Describe the bug

I’ve ran into issue with uvicorn+httptools, HttpParserInvalidURLError is raised and the server closes connection when the first line of the http/1.* request is split into several tcp packets. It also seems like everything is fine if h11 used instead of httptools.

To reproduce

import socket
import threading as th
from time import sleep

import uvicorn

########## HELPERS ##########
def receive_all(sock):
    chunks = []
    while True:
        chunk = sock.recv(1024)
        if not chunk:
            break

        chunks.append(chunk)

    return b''.join(chunks)


async def stub_app(scope, receive, send):
    event = await receive()
    d = b'whatever'
    await send({
        'type': 'http.response.start',
        'status': 200,
        'headers': [
            [b'Content-Length', str(len(d)).encode()],
            [b'Content-Type', b'text/plain'],
        ]
    })
    await send({'type': 'http.response.body', 'body': d, 'more_body': False})
#############################


def send_fragmented_req(path):

    sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
    sock.connect(('127.0.0.1', 5000))
    d = (
        f'GET {path} HTTP/1.1\r\n'
        'Host: localhost\r\n'
        'Connection: close\r\n\r\n'
    ).encode()

    split = len(path) // 2
    # send first part
    sock.sendall(d[:split])
    sleep(0.01)  # important, ~100% error, without this the chances of reproducing the error are pretty low

    # send second part
    sock.sendall(d[split:])
    
    # read response
    resp = receive_all(sock)
    sock.shutdown(socket.SHUT_RDWR)
    sock.close()
    return resp


def test():
    t = th.Thread(target=lambda: uvicorn.run(stub_app, host='127.0.0.1', port=5000, http='httptools'))
    t.daemon = True
    t.start()
    sleep(1)    # wait for unicorn to start
    
    path = '/?param=' + 'q' * 10
    print(send_fragmented_req(path).decode())


if __name__ == '__main__':
    test()


# Console output:
# INFO:     Started server process [748603]
# INFO:     Waiting for application startup.
# INFO:     ASGI 'lifespan' protocol appears unsupported.
# INFO:     Application startup complete.
# INFO:     Uvicorn running on http://127.0.0.1:5000 (Press CTRL+C to quit)
# WARNING:  Invalid HTTP request received.
# Traceback (most recent call last):
#   File "httptools/parser/parser.pyx", line 258, in httptools.parser.parser.cb_on_url
#   File "/_/lib/python3.8/site-packages/uvicorn/protocols/http/httptools_impl.py", line 193, in on_url
#     parsed_url = httptools.parse_url(url)
#   File "httptools/parser/url_parser.pyx", line 105, in httptools.parser.url_parser.parse_url
# httptools.parser.errors.HttpParserInvalidURLError: invalid url b'am=qqqqqqqqqq'
#
# During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
#
# Traceback (most recent call last):
#   File "/_/lib/python3.8/site-packages/uvicorn/protocols/http/httptools_impl.py", line 131, in data_received
#     self.parser.feed_data(data)
#   File "httptools/parser/parser.pyx", line 212, in httptools.parser.parser.HttpParser.feed_data
# httptools.parser.errors.HttpParserCallbackError: `on_url` callback error

Expected behavior

HTTP response:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:36:10 GMT
server: uvicorn
content-length: 8
content-type: text/plain

whatever

Actual behavior

Server closes connection without a response.

Environment

Running uvicorn 0.15.0 with CPython 3.8.2 on Linux Dependencies: uvicorn==0.15.0 h11==0.12.0 httptools==0.3.0

[euri10]

I’ve understood your solution idea. If it’s ok I’d like to try. I’d like to take some time for it though, to look aroud codebase since i know little about it at the moment.

sure ! take #1263 if you want as a baseline, I did that quickly so I’m not sure there are no edge cases, would be good to add tests for that : in the protocols module that should be the best, not sure how to handle the fragmentation in a test though but in that module we deal with several bare http requests so that would be a good place to add your snippet adapted for our tests format.

[div1001]

want to takle it @div1001 ?

I’ve understood your solution idea. If it’s ok I’d like to try. I’d like to take some time for it though, to look aroud codebase since i know little about it at the moment.