SCSS over LESS?
See original GitHub issueI vote for SCSS over LESS. Then we can use Bourbon, which is an amazing mixin library that makes CSS work cake. We can use gulp-node-sass
to compile it, so users do not have to have Ruby installed.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 8 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:14 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
SASS vs LESS vs SCSS - That are the differences
This stylesheet language is strongly oriented around CSS and resembles SCSS in its syntax. Both preprocessors share some of the same properties: ...
Read more >Sass vs. Less
SCSS Apps aren't really usable under Windows (Scout crashes every now and then) and WinLess is an almost perfect counterpart to Less.app on...
Read more >SASS vs LESS: What to Choose?
LESS offers the ability to build guarded mixins which function only when specific conditions are fulfilled. SASS, on the other hand, believes ...
Read more >CSS Preprocessors - Sass vs Less
3. LESS has the nearly the same features that SASS has (and for sure has all the most important features, variables, mixins, nested...
Read more >Sass vs SCSS vs Less - Free tutorial to learn HTML and CSS
#Why SCSS first · readibility: the syntax is very similar to CSS · learning curve: it only adds a few additional features on...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I vote both + the option of having no pre processor at all.
Done.