Improved support for class fields and properties

Hey there, I’ve got a class that uses the ES7 Class Fields and Properties proposal (as outlined https://github.com/jeffmo/es-class-fields-and-static-properties)

I’ve noticed that some of my properties get recognised and added to the documentation, but some do not. The ones that do get picked up are typically the uninitialised ones or ones with null, and the ones which are ignored are typically the ones with a default value assigned.

Example:

class Tracker {
    allowedLibraries = {
        'GTM': new GtmTracker(),
        'KISS': new KissTracker(),
        'Optimizely': new OptimizelyTracker()
    };

    eventQueueName = 'tracker_stuff';

    eventQueue = null;

    get queueLength() {
        return this.eventQueue.length;
    }
    // ... rest of code
}

Only two of these members appear in the docs:

I’ve got the esdoc-es7-plugin installed and added to my config. Here are my installed versions:

"esdoc": "^0.4.7",
"esdoc-es7-plugin": "0.0.3",

[typhonrt]

Yeah… That is a Babylon AST node & not ESTree… Well. It’s still possible to use the main ESDoc repo as you could get “sneaky” with a plugin. IE you could add babylon as a dependency for the plugin and in onHandleCode you could parse it and save the AST tree to consume and add extra tags during onHandleTags adding the ClassProperty node data to the variable / member data of the class.

In my fork the AST is waiting there to be handled in onHandleAST, but the above trick is so close to being the same. I’d really like to upstream the babylon fork I have though. The Babylon AST is essentially a superset more or less of ESTree syntax.

[typhonrt]

The esdoc-es7-plugin just ignores ES7 syntax, but is also out of date, so it doesn’t support anything related to ES7 as things go.

I can’t say this will help you, but I have a fork of ESDoc that supports Babylon for parsing with all Babylon plugins enabled by default here. It’s unpublished on NPM so you have to link to the Github repo. It would be interesting to see what the results would be with you example though.