comma-style rule fails on parenthesized array item
See original GitHub issueWhat version of ESLint are you using? eslint@2.8.0
What parser (default, Babel-ESLint, etc.) are you using? "parser": "babel-eslint",
Please show your full configuration:
{
"extends": "eslint-config-airbnb",
"env": {
"browser": true,
"node": true,
"mocha": true
},
"parser": "babel-eslint",
"rules": {
//
// Safety
//
"no-unused-vars": 1,
// Do not allow `alert` calls.
"no-alert": 1,
// Use the `eslint-disable-line no-console` comment for intentional console statements.
"no-console": 1,
// The `no-use-before-define` prevents variable and function use before definition.
"no-use-before-define": 1,
// The `no-var` enforces `const` and `let`.
"no-var": 1,
// The `block-scoped-var` warns about possibly invalid logic when `var` is declared in a block scope and used outside. We prefer `const` and `let` over `var` but keep this for now.
"block-scoped-var": 1,
// Disable `guard-for-in` because we use `Object.keys().forEach` and do not have to extend `Object.prototype` for older browsers.
"guard-for-in": 0,
// Disable `no-shadow` and `no-param-reassign` to avoid useless renaming. Be careful.
"no-shadow": 0,
"no-param-reassign": 0,
//
// Coding style
//
"indent": [ 1, 2, { "SwitchCase": 1 } ],
"padded-blocks": 0,
// The `spaced-comment` warns about the commented-out source code and dirty comments.
"spaced-comment": 1,
// The `comma-dangle` helps to keep version control clean if array or object items are added or removed - only the lines that are actually changed will be highlighted.
"comma-dangle": 0,
"space-in-parens": 0,
// TODO(sompylasar): Re-enable `curly` and fix.
"curly": [ 0, "all" ],
"array-bracket-spacing": [ 1, "always" ],
"object-curly-spacing": [ 1, "always" ],
"computed-property-spacing": 0,
"brace-style": [ 1, "stroustrup", { "allowSingleLine": true } ],
"no-trailing-spaces": [ 1, { "skipBlankLines": true } ],
"linebreak-style": [ 1, "unix" ],
"no-multiple-empty-lines": [ 1, { "max": 3, "maxEOF": 1 } ],
"eol-last": [ 2, "unix" ],
"id-length": [ 1, { "min": 2, "exceptions": [ "_", "$", "i", "j", "k", "x", "y", "e" ] } ],
"camelcase": 1,
"func-names": 1,
"keyword-spacing": 1,
"space-before-blocks": 1,
"space-before-function-paren": [ 1, { "anonymous": "always", "named": "never" } ],
"quotes": [ 1, "single", "avoid-escape" ],
"no-multi-spaces": [ 1, { "exceptions": { "VariableDeclarator": true, "ImportDeclaration": true } } ],
"dot-notation": 0,
"prefer-template": 0,
"max-len": [ 1, 250, 4, { "ignoreComments": true } ],
"arrow-body-style": 0,
"object-shorthand": 0,
"no-case-declarations": 1,
//
// React:
//
"react/prop-types": 1,
"react/jsx-uses-react": 2,
"react/jsx-uses-vars": 2,
"react/react-in-jsx-scope": 2,
"react/jsx-quotes": 0,
"react/no-multi-comp": 0,
"react/sort-comp": 0,
"react/jsx-closing-bracket-location": 1,
"react/prefer-stateless-function": 1,
"react/jsx-space-before-closing": 1,
"jsx-quotes": 2,
"jsx-a11y/img-uses-alt": 0,
//
// ES6:
//
"import/default": 0,
"import/no-duplicates": 0,
"import/named": 0,
"import/namespace": 0,
"import/no-unresolved": 0,
"import/no-named-as-default": 2,
},
"plugins": [
"react",
"import"
],
"settings": {
"import/ignore": [
"node_modules",
"\\.(scss|less|css)$"
],
"import/resolver": {
"webpack": {
"config": "./webpack/configForEslintImportResolver.js"
}
}
},
"globals": {
"__DEVELOPMENT__": true,
"__SERVER__": true,
"__SERVER_DEVTOOLS__": true,
"__SERVER_DISABLE_SERVERSIDE_RENDERING__": true,
"__CLIENT__": true,
"__CLIENT_DEVTOOLS__": true,
"__LOCALHOST__": true,
"__FAST_DEVELOPMENT__": true
}
}
What did you do? Please include the actual source code causing the issue.
// snippet 1
const def = {};
const abc = [
(''
),
def,
];
def.abc = abc;
// snippet 2
const def = {};
const abc = [
(''),
def,
];
def.abc = abc;
// snippet 3
const def = {};
const abc = [
'',
def,
];
def.abc = abc;
// snippet 4
const def = {};
const abc = {
x: (''
),
def,
};
def.abc = abc;
What did you expect to happen? Validation passes on all 4 snippets.
What actually happened? Please include the actual, raw output from ESLint.
// snippet 1
const def = {};
const abc = [
(''
), // error: Bad line breaking before and after ','. (comma-style)
def,
];
def.abc = abc;
Other snippets pass.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:6 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
jsonc/comma-style | eslint-plugin-jsonc
This rule enforce consistent comma style in array literals and object literals. 1. 2. 3.
Read more >comma-style - ESLint - Pluggable JavaScript Linter
Rule Details. This rule enforce consistent comma style in array literals, object literals, and variable declarations. This rule does not apply in either...
Read more >Trailing commas - JavaScript - MDN Web Docs
JavaScript allows trailing commas wherever a comma-separated list of values is accepted and more values may be expected after the last item.
Read more >Code Issues
When a system is expected to behave in a certain way and it fails to meet the ... That way the array will...
Read more >Rules
This is a summary of the standard JavaScript rules. The best way to ... Use array literals instead of array constructors. ... Only...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@sompylasar Thanks!
I’ve confirmed this also happens with the default parser. Checking it out locally, it seems that the closing parens is not taken into account in snippet 1, but IS in snippet 4. This seems like a bug to me.
More specifically in snippet 1 in the original post,
previousItemToken
is the empty string on line 4 at this point. However, in the case of snippet 4,previousItemToken
is the closing parens.Any chance you can run ESLint on your files from the command line and share the output/confirm you’re getting the same errors?