Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

Rule Proposal: prefer-destructuring

See original GitHub issue

From requireArrayDestructuring and requireObjectDestructuring.

This rule will warn MemberExpressions as the favor of destructuring assignments.

{
    "prefer-destructuring": ["error", {"object": true, "array": true}]
}

JSCS documents seem to say that this doesn’t prefer nested destructuring. How do we address nested destructuring?

Issue Analytics

State:
Created 7 years ago
Comments:27 (22 by maintainers)

Top GitHub Comments

5reactions

platinumazurecommented, Aug 3, 2016

I think we can agree on one level for now, just so we have something for users.

All in favor? 👍 from me.

3reactions

alexlafrosciacommented, Dec 11, 2016

I’m putting the PR together to add the rule I already created as part of the core rules.

Top Results From Across the Web

prefer-destructuring - ESLint - Pluggable JavaScript Linter

This rule enforces usage of destructuring instead of accessing a property through a member expression.

Rule proposal: prefer-destructured-variables #1230 - GitHub

I understand we already have consistent-destructuring, and it already covers cases I'm going to post, but that rule is buggy, ...

ESLint: prefer-destructuring - Styleguide JavaScript

Use object destructuring when accessing and using multiple properties of an object. Destructuring avoids the usage of temporary references for those ...

What to do when ESLint rule "prefer-destructuring" makes no ...

The first example would be solved by const [firstItem] = myList; obj. · I know. · if you find it useful in general...

Rule proposal: `prefer-destructured-variables` #1230 - Issuehunt

Rule proposal : `prefer-destructured-variables` #1230. fisker posted onGitHub. .