Pointfree
See original GitHub issueWould it be possible to lint for x => f(x)
and recommend f
? There are some circumstances in which these aren’t equivalent but I think they don’t apply if you’re enforcing currying.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:5
Top Results From Across the Web
Point-Free: A video series on functional programming and the ...
Point-Free is a video series exploring functional programming and Swift.
Read more >Point-Free (@pointfreeco) · Twitter
We’re taking the week off, so no new episode, but there's plenty to catch up on:
We now have 4 episodes in our “Modern...
Read more >Point-Free - GitHub
A library for building applications in a consistent and understandable way, with composition, testing, and ergonomics in mind. Swift 7.7k 801.
Read more >Pointfree - HaskellWiki
It is a common experience when rewriting expressions in pointfree style to derive more compact, clearer versions of the code -- explicit points ......
Read more >Tacit programming - Wikipedia
Tacit programming, also called point-free style, is a programming paradigm in which function definitions do not identify the arguments (or "points") on ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
This is release in version 3.2.0 as an opt-in rule (i.e. it’s not included in the recommended config).
Recommended way to opt-in:
This rule will probably be added to the recommend config in the next major release.
I made a start on this implementing this rule. It seems to be handling the basic case right now.