Style Items Table should use human readable names in Name Field not SIDCs or Hierarchy Code
See original GitHub issueNoticed that the Name field for the many entries is using the SIDC or Hierarchy Code rather than a human readable name. Ex:
Symbols_Root}\Legacy\2525C\I-U-SRU---.emf,64,
I-U-SRU—
Because this is the name a user will see in both the Pro style manager and more importantly the Pro symbol editor these should be changed to human-readable names (Note: the key field should likely remain the SIDC)
(Note: Updated original description to include Style Items)
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:10 (9 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
MIL-STD-129R Military Marking for Shipment and Storage
Shipment planning for supplies, equipment, and ammunition will be as specified in this standard. A marking is the numbers, letters, bar codes, ...
Read more >10 SQL standards to make your code more readable in 2021
SQL naming standards and SQL formatting standards for databases like BigQuery.
Read more >Chapter 4. Organizing and Naming Files and Folders
Segregating originals and derivatives is a good way to organize your files, particularly from a file-handling point of view:
Read more >Update-MgIdentityGovernancePrivilegedAccessGroup
This field is mandatory and should be set to api://AzureADTokenExchange for ... For a complete list of GUIDs and their equivalent friendly service...
Read more >DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTERFACE STANDARD
This standard provides a standardized, structured set of graphical symbols for the display of information in command and control (C2) systems ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I believe this is resolved - I don’t think I’ve seen any SIDCs in the symbol names for the released mil2525c_b2 style
@abouffard can you update this issue?