Stuck on an issue?

Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.

And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.

~leave_here alias for 'not is_included'

See original GitHub issue

I rely heavily on not is_included to process my devenvs. I’m assuming that this is the way it’s expressed in use cases (to be useful). But thinking about the negation of inclusion is too much to think about. I find myself always having to think about it. I think it’s just simpler to think about the intent of its use.

Issue Analytics

State:
Created 3 years ago
Comments:6 (6 by maintainers)

Top GitHub Comments

1reaction

prusse-martincommented, Oct 20, 2020

My bad, you are right root is relative to the current devenv file.

Maybe we could deprecate the root variable naming and name it file_location (or devenv_file_location) since there is a request to support referencing devenv files from the web and use the alias is_top_level = not is_included to avoid root related terms.

0reactions

majidaldocommented, Oct 21, 2020

My bad, you are right root is relative to the current devenv file.

Maybe we could deprecate the root variable naming and name it file_location (or devenv_file_location) since there is a request to support referencing devenv files from the web and use the alias is_top_level = not is_included to avoid root related terms.

this_file_path, and this_file_dir. and is_base