Coverage reports do not cover all contracts
See original GitHub issueEnvironment information
brownie
Version: 1.14.6solc
Version: 8.0.0- Python Version: 3.8.5
- OS: linux
What was wrong?
Please include information like:
I have 3 contracts that work in interaction with each others.
My testing script is on one file.
When I run brownie test --coverage
I get a coverage report for only one of the contracts. I’d like to get it for all of the contracts.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Reactions:10
- Comments:8
Top Results From Across the Web
Part 30 - Cost Accounting Standards Administration
(1) Include all affected CAS-covered contracts and subcontracts regardless of their status (i.e., open or closed) or the fiscal year in which the...
Read more >Understanding Your Insurance Policy
All–risk coverage, under which all losses are covered except those losses specifically excluded. If the loss is not excluded, then it is covered....
Read more >Coverage Evaluation — Brownie 1.19.2 documentation
During coverage analysis, all contract calls are executed as transactions. This gives a more accurate coverage picture by allowing analysis of methods that...
Read more >SCA Coverage & Exemptions - U.S. Department of Labor
SCA does not apply to the following: Contracts for construction of public buildings or public works covered by DBA; PCA work required by...
Read more >Questions and Answers on Reporting of Offers of Health ... - IRS
Information reporting under section 6056 was first required with respect to coverage offered (or not offered) in 2015.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I found, that it happens with contracts that use the
immutable
modifier. Maybe because of this:as mentioned in the docs here. But I’m not sure that it’s the only reason which causes such behavior.
still having the same issue 😢