Formatting errors on ETH-like networks
See original GitHub issueWe’ve been having an issue with fetching transaction receipts on ETH-like networks for the new version of MyCrypto. The problem occurs because networks like RSK return an invalid root
for transaction receipts which isn’t a valid hash. (There may be other such formatting errors on other networks)
The error in question:
invalid hash (arg="hash", value="0x01", version=4.0.48)
Would it be possible to have settings for looser formatting requirements to use ethers.js
with more networks? For our use-case we don’t necessarily always care that the receipt upholds the entire formatting requirement.
Thanks for building such a great library! ❤️
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:9 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
ethutil - Go Packages
Package ethutil provides utilities used for dealing with Ethereum concerns in the context of implementing cross-chain interfaces defined in ...
Read more >Another Scenario 4 Networking Issue - IBM Community
Your hostname resolves. This an indication that traffic outbound from the z/OS machine is not working correctly. I don't see any errors in...
Read more >The Oracle Problem: Unlocking the Potential of Blockchain
Like Bitcoin, Ethereum is built on blockchain technology, has a distributed ledger and a decentralized peer-to-peer network, and shares many of the same ......
Read more >draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-09
Introduction This document defines two NMDA compatible [RFC8342] YANG 1.1 [RFC7950] modules for the management of network interfaces.
Read more >Klaytn v1.8.0 Release Notes - Medium
eth namespace APIs are now available to support Ethereum API format (#1076 #1077 #1083 #1088 ... Set hard fork block numbers for Cypress...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Looks to be working! I will be bumping our version and removing the hack that we used. I’ll report back if we see any further issues! Thanks for the fast response!
Awesome!
Thanks! 😃