Multiple no-arg lambda functions use same variable name (underscore)
See original GitHub issueI’m having trouble creating a minimal example, but having several optional-arg lambdas -> something (-> something-more))
in one line of code reuses/redefines the underscore variable name in the compiled Python code which sometimes seems to breaks my code.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:10 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Python's lambda with underscore for an argument?
Underscore _ is a valid identifier and is used here as a variable name. It will always return True for the argument passed...
Read more >Allow the parameter name _ (underscore) multiple times in ...
This crashes with: SyntaxError: duplicate argument '_' in function definition. Using an underscore as a parameter name or variable name is a ...
Read more >Python Lambda with underscore as an argument
A lambda function can take more than one number of arguments, ... This variable name is usually a name for an ignored variable....
Read more >A tour of the Dart language
This page shows you how to use each major Dart feature, from variables and operators to classes and libraries, with the assumption that...
Read more >High-order functions and lambdas
Underscore for unused variables. If the lambda parameter is unused, you can place an underscore instead of its name:.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@ArneBachmann @Sitwon I think I’m going to close this issue as a won’t fix, under the rationale that no-arg lambdas aren’t really built for nesting, and all the possible fixes I can think of only make no-arg lambdas more complicated.
@ArneBachmann Yeah, that’s probably a good idea. I’ll change this to be a documentation issue.