Consider removing using non-unicode Encoding in the library, leaving the use of FallbackEncoding
See original GitHub issueHello!
Consider removing using non-unicode Encoding
in the library, leaving the use of FallbackEncoding
.
Or add use CodePagesEncodingProvider.Instance.GetEncoding(...)
, or register (adding target netcoreapp3_0?)CodePagesEncodingProvider.Instance
The background can be read here #445
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:14
Top Results From Across the Web
Add target .NET Core 3.0 · Issue #445 · ExcelDataReader ...
Gets or sets the encoding to use when the input XLS lacks a CodePage ... Consider removing using non-unicode Encoding in the library, ......
Read more >How can I remove non-ASCII characters but leave periods ...
An easy way to change to a different codec, is by using encode() or ... You may use the following code to remove...
Read more >Powershell base64 encode utf8. UTF8Encoding encoding ...
Base64_Encoding (CLIENT_ID:CLIENT_SECRET) Most of the usage perform this Base64 encoding with encoding type as "UTF-8". GitHub Gist: instantly share code, ...
Read more >Support non-Unicode character encoding in Azure Logic ...
Handle non-Unicode characters in Azure Logic Apps by converting text payloads to UTF-8 with base64 encoding and Azure Functions.
Read more >Localizations and character encodings - Developer guides
Firefox needs a fallback encoding that it uses for non-conforming legacy content that doesn't declare its encoding. For most locales, the fallback encoding...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@rstm-sf Thanks, but alas the tests depend on run order. The tests run alphabetically and fail if you rename them to f.ex TestA and TestB
I only suggest simplifying the use of the library to users of the .NET Core platform (in fact, this is the main central audience)