Link definitions not propogated to nested parser
See original GitHub issueCurrently, link definitions cannot be used inside directives, e.g.
```{note}
[reference]
```
[reference]: https://github.com/ExecutableBookProject
will not work, but this will:
```{note}
[reference]
[reference]: https://github.com/ExecutableBookProject
```
This will also be the case for upcoming footnotes
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:12 (12 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
FParsec backtracking in nested parser - Stack Overflow
But now I want to parse it with FParsec and I don't get the inner parser to not be greedy. My current parsers...
Read more >"unknown" option should apply to nested fields so ... - GitHub
I copied from Meta.exclude , but linked to Schema(exclude) . ... (Note: does not propagate to nested fields.) Use EXCLUDE, INCLUDE or RAISE....
Read more >Data Extraction: Parse a 3-Nested JSON Object and Convert it ...
Data Extraction: Parse a 3-Nested JSON Object and Convert it to a pandas dataframe. Reference: Jason Bourne Poster.
Read more >Resolving problems when using messages - IBM
Use the advice given here to help you to resolve common problems that can arise when you use messages.
Read more >Parsing - Datadog Docs
Some examples demonstrating how to use parsers: Key value or logfmt; Parsing dates; Alternating patterns; Optional attribute; Nested JSON; Regex; List and ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Actually I’m not sure if this is strictly part of the CommonMark spec (see this interactive demo). I’ll have to see in mistletoe-ebp, if storing all potential definition reference as ‘pending references’ breaks any tests, because this would make things a little easier.
I’m not sure of an ideal solution off-hand; just somehow you need to ‘defer’ the processing of Markdown span tokens until you’ve found all possible link/footnote definitions.
It’s a bit of a peculiarity of Markdown, that for example, you can’t just identify the references through a regex, then store them for later replacement with the definitions, because whether or not they can be immediately resolved can have a direct bearing on how the subsequent text is parsed.
For example, this:
Is parsed to this
a*b*
but if the definition is not available:
[cd]