What's the reason for using a "develop" branch?
See original GitHub issueCurious why we are calling it “develop” and not just using “master” since this is our own repository and not a fork.
I think the name itself is kind of trivial, but remembering to git checkout develop
instead of master
feels like an unnecessary cognitive overhead to remember. I’m just curious if there’s a specific reason for this, or plans to change it to master
at some point?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:11 (11 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Why need Develop Branch in GitFlow - Stack Overflow
We consider origin/develop to be the main branch where the source code of HEAD always reflects a state with the latest delivered development...
Read more >git - The trend of the "develop" branch going away
The main reason we abandoned the develop branch is because it tended to get too large and too time consuming to see what...
Read more >What's the point of creating dev branch in git, when we ... - Quora
The develop branch is the heartbeat of the project. It is always up to date. It is the reference with respect to which...
Read more >Is there really a need for a develop branch? : r/git - Reddit
It is faster, easier, and better organized to have a separate master and dev branch making it more difficult for someone to screw...
Read more >Gitflow Workflow | Atlassian Git Tutorial
But, instead of branching off of main , feature branches use develop as their parent branch. When a feature is complete, it gets...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Ok well I’m not going to go down that hole of transitioning today. I imagine/hope that you can just delete the master branch and rename the develop branch to master
@chrisjsewell nice compromise, I like the idea 😃