Add `lower_` property to `Span` class?
See original GitHub issueThis is a feature request, not a bug. (Is there a better place to post re: enhancements?)
For convenience, it would be great to have a lower_
property on spans analogous to the lemma_
property. Looks like it would be a super straightforward change, maybe even just
cdef class Span:
...
property lower_:
def __get__(self):
return ' '.join([t.lower_ for t in self]).strip()
Thanks in advance!
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments:6 (3 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Span HTML – How to Use the Span Tag with CSS
You can use the HTML span tag as a container to group inline elements together so you can style or manipulate them with...
Read more >I need help adding details to a span element - Stack Overflow
3.For a given user property, e.g Age, locate a PARAGRAPH element and give the child SPAN with class prop an HTML attribute of...
Read more >Few Properties of Span Tag in HTML - eduCBA
Here we discuss properties of span tag along with different examples and its ... Using the span tags in your code helps to...
Read more >HTML span Tag - GeeksforGeeks
The HTML span element is a generic inline container for inline elements and content. It is used to group elements for styling purposes...
Read more >How to Vertically Align a Text Within a <span> Tag to the Center
On this page, we'll demonstrate how to vertically align a text within an HTML element. Use the CSS align-items, text-align, or vertical-align properties....
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Fixed in #883!
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.