Codegen for events
See original GitHub issueWriting events is currently very verbose, requiring lots of boilerplate code.
Additionally, many events simply take the form
for (Callback callback : callbacks) {
callback.onEvent(...);
}
See also this comment in EventFactory
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Reactions:5
- Comments:9 (8 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Codegen for TurboModules does not allow for Events to be ...
I am working on an app that requires a native module to be able to emit random events. In my case I am...
Read more >CodeGen International - Events - Facebook
Technology Opportunity for Travel Agents Registration. OCT28. 4:30 PM UTC+05:30. Online event ; Planting 1200 Native trees at Pansalthenna, Ankumbura. NOV30. 7: ...
Read more >graphql-codegen-events - npm
Generate event types for graphql codegen plugin. Latest version: 0.0.18, last published: a year ago. Start using graphql-codegen-events in your project by ...
Read more >Code Generation for Event-B - Ethz
Abstract. We present an approach to generating program code from Event-B models that is correct-by-construction. Correctness is guaranteed by the com-.
Read more >1033100 - codegen for events that have an init dictionary member ...
I just tried using the event codegen for CSSFontFaceLoadEvent in bug 1028497, where the init dictionary has a member with a sequence type...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I think whatever form this takes should be optional - there are scenarios where you’d want something more complex than a forEach, like early-exit.
An alternative I think of would be a factory method to generate
Function<T[], T>
, possibly when givenClass<T>
and/or the method to dispatch, either as aMethod
or aMethodHandle
. However, it is still restricted, since not all callbacks just call sub-callbacks; some have early halt or tristate merging, so the usefulness isn’t as much as we would assume.In addition, we need to check the performance of that
Function
to make sure it’s not slower than the current lambda meta call site. Somewhere it saysProxy
makes spring calls about 10% to 20% slower than direct interface calls.