Support do expressions
See original GitHub issueIs there any plans to support do
expressions?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:10 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Support for ECMAScript 'do'-expressions #13156 - GitHub
I'm curious about why we need do in do expression , why not just make any statement be an expression... import h from...
Read more >A first look: do expressions in JavaScript (De ... - freeCodeCamp
No, it's about the T39 proposal called do expressions. If approved by TC39, “do expressions” will be part of JavaScript and could help...
Read more >Proposal: “Statements as Expressions” using do - Ponyfoo
The do expression proposal lets you write a block of statements to be evaluated. The “completion value” is returned as the result of...
Read more >Guide to expression syntax - Microsoft Support
Learn how to use expressions in Access when you need to work with values that do not reside directly in your data.
Read more >Arrow function expressions - JavaScript - MDN Web Docs
An arrow function expression is a compact alternative to a traditional function expression, with some semantic differences and deliberate ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
@sanfilippopablo no problem at all 😃 ! The community needs more compassion and patience. My mentor, the chairman at the Post - PHD - on Computer Engineering at Stanford, would always say these three things:
if
statements is a sign of bad design.Glad to help, whenever you need 😃
Very kindly,
PS: Whenever you want to create a variable unassigned, it’s rather better to work with undefined, so
let foo
is just enough…undefined
isfalsy
, thereforelet foo = null
is redundant 😄Yea, let’s wait for it to advance a little bit. Thanks for suggesting!