Make buffered console output available to testResultsProcessor
See original GitHub issueDo you want to request a feature or report a bug?
feature
What is the current behavior?
A testResultsProcessor
is given access to a lot of meaningful data but one thing not yet available is the console output from each test case.
What is the expected behavior?
It would be very helpful to provide the buffered console output to test results processors like jest-junit to include console output for each <testcase>
(see https://github.com/palmerj3/jest-junit/issues/45 for more details).
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:6
Top Results From Across the Web
Module 'jest-junit' in the testResultsProcessor option was not ...
When running it as part of the CI build process or on another Windows machine, I am getting the following error: Module 'jest-junit'...
Read more >Jest Test Results Processor for Generating A Summary in HTML
As you run Jest from within the terminal, a file called test-report.html will be created within your root folder containing information about your...
Read more >jest-cli | Yarn - Package Manager
Developer Ready: Complete and ready to set-up JavaScript testing solution. Works out of the box for any React project. Instant...
Read more >blog - Nick Korbel
I was able to gradually translate each test into code. ... Next we need to make sure that the log information is written...
Read more >Jest HTML Reporter / Results Processor - jest-stare - npm
jest html reporter (results processor) to view HTML jest results, ... Or, add testResultsProcessor to jest config to specfy jest-stare ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Interesting! I think this should be possible, but I haven’t dug into it.
That seems super silly. I’ve been looking at the console stuff lately, and we should definitely still populate
console
even though we suppress the output in the default reporter.