Lightrun Answers was designed to reduce the constant googling that comes with debugging 3rd party libraries. It collects links to all the places you might be looking at while hunting down a tough bug.
And, if you’re still stuck at the end, we’re happy to hop on a call to see how we can help out.
Specifying a basename when app isn't hosted at site root
See original GitHub issueI’m trying to use redux-first-router in a create-react-app app that specifies a homepage in package.json since the app won’t be hosted at the root of the site. From what I can tell, it looks like I’ll have to include that route prefix for each entry in my routesMap. I’ve been looking through the RFR source to see if there’s a way to pass a basename (or similar) option that would allow the pathname to be enhanced if that option exists but it doesn’t look like it’s possible at the moment.
Is there currently a way to use RFR when an app isn’t going to run at the root of a site? If not, is it reasonable to request the ability to specify a basename - perhaps in the options passed to connectRoutes?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Reactions:3
- Comments:14 (14 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Top Related Medium Post
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Troubleshoot Live Code
Top Related Reddit Thread
Top Related Hackernoon Post
Top Related Tweet
Top Related Dev.to Post
Top Related Hashnode Post
basenames are supported now:
https://github.com/faceyspacey/redux-first-router/issues/103#issuecomment-329972201
We don’t. That’s not what Im saying. I’m saying there’s likely more that also needs to be done and we should find it, or this would be closed.
Just take it over brotha and take it all the way.