Allow configuring "get" and "set" prefixes.
See original GitHub issueThis is a feature request for being allowed to use getters and setters that don’t use the traditional Java Bean notation, with get
and set
prefixes, this way a getter with just the name of the variable would be used, this is helpful for people using AutoValue, such as in here #2344.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Reactions:2
- Comments:13 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Example: Allowed to prefixes in a transit gateway configuration
Direct Connect gateway association with the transit gateway: Set the allowed to prefixes to 10.0.0.0/8. This CIDR block covers both VPC CIDR blocks....
Read more >Add "suffix" configuration option to @Setter/@Getter (like ...
Even eclipse allows to configure prefixes and suffixes for fields (see Window -> Preferences -> Java -> Code Style).
Read more >Why are getters prefixed with the word "get"? - Stack Overflow
The best answer I have ever heard for using the get/set prefixes is as such: ... The convention there is having a Variable...
Read more >Configuration in ASP.NET Core - Microsoft Learn
Learn how to use the Configuration API to configure AppSettings in an ASP.NET Core app.
Read more >How to Setup LuckPerms Chat (Prefixes & Formatting)
https://server.proIn this video, we show you install and use the LuckPerms Chat plugin for Minecraft Java.
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
This will actually be possible globally, with #2800, using
DefaultAccessorNamingStrategy
configured to use different prefix.Looks like there was already an issue #1325; but will close that, leave this open, for better visibility (newer issue sorted first).
Earlier issue suggested introduction of
@JsonPOJO
prefix: I guess that is one possibility, amongst others (probably needs to be a combination, maybe with “config overrides”).