High vulnerability package need to be updated [dot-prop]
See original GitHub issuePackage update request.
the dot-prop package has been found vulnerable and needed to be updated.
[REQUIRED] Environment info
8.6.0
firebase-tools:
macOS
Platform:
[REQUIRED] Test case
npm audit
[REQUIRED] Steps to reproduce
npm audit
[REQUIRED] Expected behavior
no vulnerability
[REQUIRED] Actual behavior
found 2 high severity vulnerabilities in 1370 scanned packages
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Comments:5 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Facing vulnerability security issue for dot-prop when updating ...
After updating npm to the latest, I ran npm audit and got two vulnerabilities for the dot-prop package dependency which is showing under...
Read more >Prototype Pollution in dot-prop | CVE-2020-8116 | Snyk
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. It is possible for a user to modify the prototype of a base...
Read more >CVE-2020-8116 Detail - NVD
CVE-2020-8116 Detail. Current Description. Prototype pollution vulnerability in dot-prop npm package versions before 4.2.1 and versions 5.x ...
Read more >Resolve NPM security vulnerabilities | by Payam Mousavi
It says, the dot-prop package has a security issue which needs to get ... N vulnerabilities required manual review and could not be...
Read more >Auditing package dependencies for security vulnerabilities
npm audit requires packages to have package.json and package-lock.json files. ... If security vulnerabilities are found and updates are available, ...
Read more >
Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start Free
Top Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
@WuHarry we’ve done all we can do here, @bkendall is working on an update to
superstatic
which will fix the transitive dep.Opps, seems that I missed all the messages. Thanks and well done team!