Possible to require package author review for libdef updates?
See original GitHub issueIn react-navigation
we have a CI that tests our libdef against an example project. We ask that users submit their libdef changes first to our repo, so we can make sure they don’t break our example project. We then send PRs to flow-typed
once the changes have been committed to our repo.
This adds a layer of testing beyond the tests in this repo and helps protect against breaking libdef changes.
However, individual package users have been sending PRs on our libdef in this repo, causing the libdef versions to get out-of-sync. Is it possible to restrict flow-typed
PRs for a specific package to package authors, or alternately to require their reviews for any PRs on their packages?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:7 (7 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
How should these definitions be consumed? · Issue #4 - GitHub
Adding a new library definition is as simple as sending a pull request that includes the libdef, a specification of the package-version the...
Read more >Package Review Process - Fedora Docs
In order for a new package to be added to Fedora, the package must first undertake a formal review. The process is governed...
Read more >lib/spack/docs/packaging_guide.rst - GitLab
Packages allow a the packager to encapsulate the build logic for different versions, compilers, options, platforms, and dependency combinations in one place.
Read more >User's Guide - IBM
If the order is fulfilled within the allowed time, the server sends SMP/E the information required to download the resultant package (FTP ...
Read more >Project IMPACT: Computer-Administered Instruction - ERIC
(HSSS) reflects a compromise between immediate and longer-range requirements. Off-the- shelf hardware and software components were used wherever possible, ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
This is almost a reality stay tuned! Just waiting on some webhook setups but here’s the test PR to showcase
https://github.com/flow-typed/flow-typed/pull/4388#issuecomment-1275273086
We should look into a gitbot eventually that looks so files changes and tags appropriately though I don’t have experience in that realm. @GAntoine we could leverage the package.json from a flow version for this situation