Windows issues
See original GitHub issueNow that Flow supports Windows (yay!), this probably should too.
2 issues I’m seeing so far:
First, the obvious one here, probably just needs the binary path added.
I tried to fix that locally, but I encountered another bigger issues: the file names. Git for Windows really didn’t seem to enjoy paths like flow_>=v0.28.x
.
Don’t know what a good solution would be.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 7 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:21 (15 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Troubleshoot problems updating Windows - Microsoft Support
Have issues installing Windows updates? Start here. · Free up some drive space so you can run updates · Restart to apply installed...
Read more >17 most common Windows 10 problems and how to fix them
1. Can't upgrade from Windows 7 or Windows 8 · 2. Can't upgrade to the latest Windows 10 version · 3. You have...
Read more >9 Most Common Windows 10 Problems and Their Solutions
9 Most Common Windows 10 Problems and Their Solutions ; #1. Stop too much data usage in the background ; #2. Minimize notifications...
Read more >Windows 10 Troubleshooting: The Most Common Problems ...
Issues updating to the latest version of Windows 10 · Not enough storage space to complete an update · Mouse cursor starts moving...
Read more >Microsoft issues fix for desktops on Windows 10 systems • The ...
Microsoft over the last week addressed issues in Windows 10 and 11 systems caused when users installed the KB5019509 update, leaving some unable ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Ok, so to add some closure here I think we should go with:
flow_>=v0.30
->flow_v0.30-
flow_<=v0.30
->flow_-v0.30
flow_v0.30
->flow_v0.30
flow_>=v0.30_<=v0.35
->flow_v0.30-v0.35.0
Since we already use
_
to separate “name” from “version”, I think it’s best to have something clearly different.-
also makes sense for indicating a range.So I think the work that’s needed here goes as follows:
validate-defs
/run-tests
and friends)@samwgoldman would you mind taking a crack at this?
What about
flow_>=v0.30
->flow_v0.30-
flow_<=v0.30
->flow_-v0.30
flow_v0.30
->flow_v0.30
flow_>=v0.30_<=v0.35
->flow_v0.30-v0.35.0
or
flow_>=v0.30
->flow_v0.30...
flow_<=v0.30
->flow_...v0.30
flow_v0.30
->flow_v0.30
flow_>=v0.30_<=v0.35
->flow_v0.30...v0.35.0
If all we need is to specify a potentially open ended range, then we can get away from the
>=
<=
mindset