Flaky test: When_task_is_checking_synchronization_context_on_UI_thread_it_should_succeed
See original GitHub issueWhen running https://ci.appveyor.com/project/dennisdoomen/fluentassertions/builds/34562293 for #1371
When_task_is_checking_synchronization_context_on_UI_thread_it_should_succeed
failed.
I suspect it is because it uses a RealClock
together with the timing sensitive CompleteWithin
.
Can the intention of the test be implementation with a timing insensitive assertion?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 3 years ago
- Reactions:1
- Comments:5 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
How to Fix Flaky Tests - Semaphore CI
Randomly failing tests are the hardest to debug. Here's a framework you can use to fix them and keep your test suite healthy....
Read more >Flaky Tests: Getting Rid Of A Living Nightmare In Testing
Flaky tests have even given folks nightmares and sleepless nights. In this article, Ramona Schwering shares her experiences to help you get ...
Read more >Test Flakiness - Methods for identifying and dealing with flaky ...
A flaky test is a test that both passes and fails periodically without any code changes. Flaky tests are definitely annoying but they...
Read more >Flaky Test Management | Cypress Documentation
What are test retries? Cypress has the ability to automatically retry failed tests to mitigate flaky tests from failing entire test runs or...
Read more >Flaky tests - Testim overview
A test is considered flaky if it passed after a retry, meaning on the first try it failed and then after one or...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Please mind the sibling test without “UI”.
Yes, #1566 should hopefully have solved this issue.