PropertyInfoSelectorAssertions.NotBeWritable?
See original GitHub issueHi,
I just found out about PropertyInfoSelector
type and its corresponding PropertyInfoSelectorAssertions
type. I see that thereās a BeWritable
assertion method included, but oddly enough, thereās no NotBeWritable
counterpart.
Is there a reason why? Iād like to know before I implement my own NotBeWritable
extension method. š
Thank you!
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments:6 (4 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
c# - Simplifying an expression selector
Is there a way of being able to call ArgumentNotNull without needing the () => part of the lambda and simply call Ensure....
Read more >c# - Delegate that selects a writable property on a generic
In the following contrived example, I have a collection of PropertyManager s that each contains selector and assigner delegates to read from andĀ ......
Read more >Accessing properties by name with compile-time typesafety
Creating TypeAccessor. PropertyInfo[] properties = typeof(T).GetProperties(BindingFlags.Instance | (includeNonPublic ? BindingFlags.NonPublic :Ā ...
Read more >Customizing Comparisons in FluentAssertions with Options
It's not terrible, but it was really a step back from using IncludeAllDeclaredProperties method which promised to do exactly that before I triedĀ ......
Read more >Asserting object graph equivalence using Fluent Assertions 2.0
This expression has access to the property path, the property info and the subject's run-time and compile-time type. You could also take aĀ ......
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
I could take a shot at this, unless I should interpret @jnyrup š as sign that he is willing to do it.
I see. Well, we would welcome a PR š