how to ignore import & require statement
See original GitHub issue@kitten as a npm package,we always have to import third packages,like so:
import {get} from 'lodash'
class Demo1 extends React.Component {
render () {
// do something with get
}
}
actually,we prefer to use scope to pass global variables。and this will throw an error。
so do you have some support on such an ignore statement?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:6
Top Results From Across the Web
4 Answers - 4 - Stack Overflow
ESLint: Require statement not part of import statement.(@typescript-eslint/no-var-requires) · Ask Question. Asked 3 years ago.
Read more >typescript - # - eslint - DEV Community
Require statement not part of import statement.eslint[@typescript-eslint/no-var- ... Ignore all instances of var requires at the file level.
Read more >imports-loader - webpack
The imports loader can add the necessary require('whatever') calls, ... By default loader generate ES module named syntax. ... Disable AMD Import Syntax....
Read more >How to Bypass ES Modules Errors in Next.js with Dynamic ...
You'll need most of these packages when you're building JAMStack ... How to Bypass ES Modules Errors in Next.js with Dynamic Imports.
Read more >Modules: Packages | Node.js v19.3.0 Documentation
js will treat the following as CommonJS when passed to node as the initial input, or when referenced by import statements, import() expressions,...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
you’re welcome?
you can use the
transformCode
props on LiveProvider:and pass
Lodash
in the scope