Cat Photo App Step 44 allows multiple type attributes
See original GitHub issueDescribe the Issue
Step 44 will pass if the new radio input
is given multiple type
attributes.
Affected Page
Your code
This will pass:
<input type="radio" type="text"> Indoor
Expected behavior
Step should fail if there is more than one type
attribute, even if they all have the value radio
.
Screenshots
No response
System
- Device: Desktop
- OS: Linux (Fedora 36)
- Browser: Firefox
- Version: 104.0.2
Additional context
No response
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created a year ago
- Comments:11 (11 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Learn HTML by Building a Cat Photo App - Step 44 - HTML-CSS
Your code so far** <html> <body> <h1>CatPhotoApp</h1> <main> <section> <h2>Cat Photos</h2> <!-- TODO: Add link to cat photos --> <p>Click ...
Read more >Free Code Camp Walkthrough 1 | HTML - Cat Photo App
In this tutorial I'll show you how to get through the HTML Cat Photo App section on Free Code Camp that teaches you...
Read more >Learn HTML by Building a Cat Photo App - Steps 41-50
Playlist with all steps : https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLa-0Y08VoGnoZQbp32TfsRypozgB7Lp4GWalk through steps 41-50 of the Learn HTML by ...
Read more >Learn HTML by Building a Cat Photo App (50-60) - YouTube
Timestamps:00:00 - Intro00:15 - 5001:10 - 5101:42 - 5202:10 - 5304:00 - 5404:16 - 5505:11 - 5606:02 - 5706:49 - 5807:37 - 5908:...
Read more >Learn HTML by Building a Cat Photo App | PLAYCODE
Learn HTML by Building a Cat Photo App. Step 1 ... Step 44. PRO. Step 45. PRO. Step 46. PRO. Step 47. PRO....
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
As such, I am closing this in favour of the previously linked PR tracking possible HTML validation. no hurt feelings
I completely understand this sentiment. If you want to close this issue and forget about it, it won’t hurt my feelings 🥲 But the specs definitely do not allow it and the W3 validator will throw an error. But I suppose you could have this problem with every step. I think @ieahleen was onto something and this is really more an issue of whether we should validate the HTML. So ya, I vote to drop this issue.