(FEL): redux use const for action types doesn't accept a valid answer

Describe the Issue

As pointed out by @raditotev in the affected page, there is a valid solution, that isn’t accepted by the tests. But if we keep adding to the regex, it will be too complicated, and it will get out of hand for new contributor to be able to help.

Radi comment: https://github.com/freeCodeCamp/freeCodeCamp/pull/46753#issuecomment-1174857836

@lulululu12345 has mentioned a regex solution in his comment, but I am hoping there is an alternative to regex

Luke comment: https://github.com/freeCodeCamp/freeCodeCamp/pull/46753#issuecomment-1175136663

Here is the markdown page https://github.com/freeCodeCamp/freeCodeCamp/blob/04eaee51fc08b27576081519306819d467e62793/curriculum/challenges/english/03-front-end-development-libraries/redux/use-const-for-action-types.md

Affected Page

https://www.freecodecamp.org/learn/front-end-development-libraries/redux/use-const-for-action-types

Your code

const {LOGIN, LOGOUT} = {LOGIN: 'LOGIN', LOGOUT: 'LOGOUT'}

Expected behavior

This code is valid, so we should allow it to pass. But as mentioned before the regex is too complex, I wonder if we can do something that make the need for using regex unnecessary.

Screenshots

[ieahleen]

there is a function to strip comments that can be used, so that the last two can be included

[raditotev]

There are two conditions to be fulfilled for this test:

1. User should use variable instead of string
2. Variable should be constant

Consider this:

assert(LOGIN === 'LOGIN' && LOGOUT === 'LOGOUT') // fulfils No. 1
assert(noWhiteSpace.includes('const')) // fulfils No.2
assert.isNotOk(noWhiteSpace.includes('let')) // No.2
assert.isNotOk(noWhiteSpace.includes('var')) // No.2

I think the above will work without being too implicit regarding the solution. I would say the last two assert.isNotOk could even be omitted because there is always a slim chance someone might write unconsciously some comment that might contain let or var as substrings.