[Guide] Update tutorial - Debugging JavaScript with Browser Devtools
See original GitHub issueFCC update code editor from CodeMirror
to Monaco Editor
, document need to be updated.
Edit by @raisedadead
:
These files need to be updated:
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 5 years ago
- Comments:6 (2 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Debug JavaScript - Chrome Developers
In your console.log() statements you need to explicitly specify each value that you want to inspect. With breakpoints, DevTools shows you the ...
Read more >Learn Chrome DevTools - Quick Guide to Debugging ...
Learn Chrome DevTools - Quick Guide to Debugging JavaScript, HTML and CSS. In this tutorial we are going share everything you need to...
Read more >How To Debug JavaScript with Google Chrome DevTools and ...
This tutorial will take a look at debugging JavaScript with the Google Chrome DevTools, as well as with the popular text editor Visual ......
Read more >Debugging JavaScript Efficiently with Chrome DevTools | Buddy
Debugging JavaScript Efficiently with Chrome DevTools · 1. Add Breakpoints. Adding a Breakpoint · 2. View/Make Changes to Local, Closure and ...
Read more >A Complete Guide to Debugging Javascript in Chrome
This article teaches you how to debug JavaScript code using the Chrome DevTools. You will learn how to debug one specific issue, ...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
To confirm, @cc189 & @raisedadead, you’re suggesting to change all references of CodeMirror to Monaco Editor in this guide (should it point to https://microsoft.github.io/monaco-editor/)? Assuming this should be done in all translations. I can go ahead and make this change once this is confirmed.
Sounds good @rituteb