Using 3rd party assembly routines in Custom Methods
See original GitHub issue@frhagn - we are yet another grateful consumer of your handy package. thank you!
i was hoping to use Humanizer nuget package to do some automatic property name camelCasing… i thought it’d be simple using Humanizer;
but it seems the TypeWriter template context is only aware of Microsoft, System & Typewriter namespaces.
Any help?
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 6 years ago
- Comments:14 (5 by maintainers)
Top Results From Across the Web
Retaining Compatibility To Assembly With inline Functions
My current approach is to write inline functions (with >= GNU99, -O3 inlines the function, anything else calls an external definition of that ......
Read more >Custom Action with 3rd party dll not loading
Hello, I have been struggling to figure out why a 3rd party dll will not load during a Custom Action. I have a...
Read more >Assembly Loading across AppDomains - Rick Strahl's Web Log
The problem is that the assembly can be generated in any location the user chooses and the user might generate the assembly multiple...
Read more >Initialization of Mixed Assemblies
The custom locale function definitions can be compiled to native code by using the #pragma unmanaged directive. Refrain from setting the custom ......
Read more >Calling function from other scripts c# - Unity Forum
So the hard part is getting a handle to your other script. If the objects already exist in the game scene, then you...
Read more >Top Related Medium Post
No results found
Top Related StackOverflow Question
No results found
Troubleshoot Live Code
Lightrun enables developers to add logs, metrics and snapshots to live code - no restarts or redeploys required.
Start FreeTop Related Reddit Thread
No results found
Top Related Hackernoon Post
No results found
Top Related Tweet
No results found
Top Related Dev.to Post
No results found
Top Related Hashnode Post
No results found
Top GitHub Comments
Hi @pbarranis ,
I actually implemented the original feature request and made a PR for it (#274). Stay tuned!
-Rodro-
Yes, that would be great! I have a standard tst that I use in several solutions and what really change are a bunch of parameters. Right now whenever I find some problem in my template I have to copy and paste the fix in dozens of files…